On 15 December 2023, the European Securities Market Authority (“ESMA”) updated the Q&As on MiFID II and MiFIR investor protection and intermediary topics (the “ESMA Q&A”) to include Q&A 9.35 clarifying on how investment firms should indicate parts of total costs and charges paid in or represented in foreign currency in ex-ante and ex-post costs and charges disclosure.
Investment firms are under the obligation to disclose certain information under Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 2014/65/EU (“MiFID II”) and Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation 600/2014 (“MiFIR”) to ensure transparency.
Article 24(4) of MiFID II and Article 50(3) the MiFID II Delegated Regulation 2017/565 (“MiFID II Delegated Regulation”) require investment firms, as part of their regulatory disclosure obligations, to disclose specific information to clients and potential clients including all costs and related charges. Where any part of the total costs and charges is to be paid in or represents an amount of foreign currency[1], investment firms are required to provide an indication of the currency involved and the applicable currency conversion rates and costs. However, Article 50(3) does not specify how firms should disclose such costs, neither for ex-ante nor for ex-post disclosures.
The ESMA Q&A clarifies in Section 9 (“Information on costs and charges”) in Q&A 9.35 (“Foreign currency”) how ESMA expects investment firms to indicate the parts of the total costs and charges paid in or represented in an amount of foreign currency in their ex-ante and ex-post costs and charges disclosure:
Please note that in the ex-post cost disclosure, investment firms are not expected to indicate the foreign currencies involved, nor to specify the applied currency conversion rates and costs. Only if clients request an itemised breakdown, firms should disclose the relevant foreign currencies, conversion rates, and related costs. ESMA notes that further information for each individual transaction is required by Article 59(4) MiFID II Delegated Regulation. This includes information on foreign currencies involved and the applicable currency conversion rates.
In addition, the ESMA Q&A updated Q&A 9.13 (”Aggregation of costs and charges”) outlining the disclosure requirements where firms use an all-in fee noting that the all in-fee should be disclosed under the relevant cost item (for example “ongoing charges”).
For comprehensive assistance in navigating these regulatory nuances and ensuring compliance, Zeidler’s Legal Team is available to address any queries or concerns.
Staying updated on ESMA’s clarifications is crucial for investment firms to align with MiFID II and MiFIR disclosure obligations. Secure your path to compliance with a complimentary consultation led by our expert Legal Team.
[1] For the purpose of the ESMA Q&A, the notion of “foreign currency” depends on the currency of the account and/or the reference currency of the costs and charges disclosure.